IP purity report

193.194.126.38

83/ 100

Fair

confidence: high

Usable; platforms with strict risk controls may occasionally show a CAPTCHA.

Based on signals observed from public and partner data sources at 2026-10-27 18:57 UTC. This describes IP-level risk only; platforms' internal risk data is not visible to us.

Proxy exit

Profile

What this IP is

Country / region: Ukraine · Zhytomyr Oblast · Zhytomyr
IP type: Residential
Native / broadcast: Native IP
Network: AS50633 City 2020 LLC
Reverse DNS: host19319412638.net-city.net
Devices seen in subnet: 254

Suitability

What it is good for

Each use case weighs the evidence differently; these are not one overall score.

AI services

ChatGPT · Claude · Gemini

Good fit

Main issue: Proxy IP

Least tolerant of data center and proxy exits: more likely to get degraded service, verification prompts or account limits. Spam history does not matter here

Social sign-up

X · Discord · Telegram · Reddit

Good fit

Main issue: Proxy IP

Sign-up is the strictest checkpoint: data center / proxy exits are more likely to be asked for phone verification or refused, and IPs with bulk-registration history are blocked far more often

Streaming / short video

TikTok · Netflix · YouTube

Good fit

Main issue: Proxy IP

Native IP and low sharing matter most: a broadcast IP reads as a region mismatch, and shared exits get throttled

Gaming platforms

Steam · PSN · Epic · Nintendo

Good fit

Main issue: Proxy IP

Region locks, regional pricing and gifting all follow the IP's location, so broadcast IPs tend to be treated as cross-region; data center exits carry a high risk of restrictions

Cross-border e-commerce

Amazon · eBay · Shopee

Good fit

Main issue: Proxy IP

Linked-account store closures are driven first by shared IPs, and only then by data center ranges

Email sending

SMTP · marketing email

Borderline

Main issue: Blocklist hit: s5h.net

Blocklists make or break deliverability, while sending from a data center IP is normal and is not penalised

Evidence

Why it got this score

−15
Proxy IP
Only 1 data source flags it as a proxy; the evidence is limited, so it counts at half weight
What it means
A source marks this address as a proxy exit without saying whether it is a VPN, a datacenter proxy or something else.
Which uses care
Cares most: AI services, Social sign-up, Streaming / short video, Gaming platforms, Cross-border e-commerce
Why it is weighted this way
Only one source says so, so it counts at half weight.
Can it be fixed
These labels are usually applied to whole ranges and are hard to clear by behaviour; moving to an unlabeled range is the practical fix.
−12
Blocklist hit: s5h.net
Listed by s5h.net
What it means
This IP is on a public blocklist. Most lists record addresses that sent spam or took part in scanning or attacks.
Which uses care
Cares most: Email sending; Barely looks at it: AI services, Social sign-up, Streaming / short video, Gaming platforms
Why it is weighted this way
A single aggregate list is moderate evidence, so about a dozen points; the email scenario more than doubles it because receiving servers query these lists directly.
Can it be fixed
Every list has a removal process, provided the cause is gone; some delist automatically after a quiet period.
−6
Heavily shared exit
254 devices observed in the same subnet; higher risk of guilt by association
What it means
Many devices share this exit. Whatever others do on it gets attributed to you as well.
Which uses care
Cares most: Social sign-up, Streaming / short video, Cross-border e-commerce
Why it is weighted this way
Cross-border e-commerce and social sign-up care most: shared IPs are the leading cause of linked-account bans.
Can it be fixed
Move to a dedicated or low-share exit; sharing levels vary widely between plans from the same vendor.
−6
rDNS looks like a server
Reverse hostname host19319412638.net-city.net matches server naming
What it means
The reverse hostname follows server naming (server, vps, host and the like).
Which uses care
Cares most: Email sending
Why it is weighted this way
A light deduction: one more sign of "this is a server".
Can it be fixed
You can change the PTR in the host's panel, but it is only corroboration and barely moves the total.
+3
No open ports
Network scans have not observed any open service on this IP
What it means
Network scanners have not observed any open service on this IP.
Which uses care
Barely looks at it: AI services
Why it is weighted this way
A small bonus: a small attack surface means fewer chances of ending up in scanner and abuse databases. Not evidence of home broadband; a well-firewalled server looks the same.
Can it be fixed
An inherent attribute of the IP or its range; nothing a user can change short of a different IP.
+5
Native IP
Registered and used in the same country, allocated directly by a local carrier
What it means
Registered and used in the same country, allocated directly by a local carrier: a "native IP".
Which uses care
Cares most: Streaming / short video, Gaming platforms; Barely looks at it: Email sending
Why it is weighted this way
A bonus: region-based checks will not trip.
Can it be fixed
An inherent attribute of the IP or its range; nothing a user can change short of a different IP.
+6
Spamhaus ZEN: residential range declaration
PBL — range judged dynamic by Spamhaus
What it means
Spamhaus PBL declares this range as dynamic residential space that should not send mail directly. Not a stain: it is evidence of home broadband.
Which uses care
Cares most: Email sending; Barely looks at it: AI services, Social sign-up, Streaming / short video, Gaming platforms
Why it is weighted this way
Counted as a bonus because it indirectly confirms a real access network.
Can it be fixed
An inherent attribute of the IP or its range; nothing a user can change short of a different IP.
+8
IP type: Residential
Residential broadband is the IP type risk systems trust most
What it means
A residential, mobile, education or government network address: the kind of source risk systems trust most.
Which uses care
Cares most: AI services, Social sign-up, Gaming platforms, Cross-border e-commerce; Barely looks at it: Email sending
Why it is weighted this way
A bonus: the vast majority of real people come from these networks, so the default stance is to let them through.
Can it be fixed
An inherent attribute of the IP or its range; nothing a user can change short of a different IP.

Reputation

Blocklists and abuse history

Listed on 1 of 8 blocklists checked: s5h.net.

abuseipdb abuse confidence 0%, 8 reports in 90 days

Limits

What an IP check cannot tell you

Each platform's internal risk labels: Platforms keep their own IP reputation data and ban records and do not publish them. No hit in public sources does not mean a platform has nothing on this IP.
Whether the IP is truly exclusive: Sharing is only the number of devices observed in the same subnet. It cannot show who else is using this exit right now, or what they are doing.
Which accounts this IP has been tied to: Account-to-IP links exist only inside each platform. Accounts previously banned on this IP are invisible to us.
Device, browser and behaviour: Risk systems look at IP + device fingerprint + behavioural rhythm together. A clean IP with an odd fingerprint or behaviour still gets blocked.
Whether the account profile matches the IP: When sign-up country, phone number, payment method, language or time zone disagree with the IP's location, platforms verify further. That is unrelated to IP purity.

Sources

Data sources and responses

rdap
357ms
team-cymru
58ms
ip-api.com
109ms
proxycheck.io
223ms
abuseipdb
723ms
cloud-ranges
8ms
tor-exits
8ms
rdns
947ms
shodan-internetdb
144ms
dnsbl
283ms

Machine-readable versions of this report: JSON · plain text · 中文报告