66.102.8.225

Country / region

United States · California · Mountain View

IP type

Hosting / data center

Native / broadcast

Native IP

Network

AS15169 Google LLC

Reverse DNS

google-proxy-66-102-8-225.google.com

Devices seen in subnet

3255

• −25

  IP type: Hosting / data center

  Hosting / data center IPs are the main source of automated traffic

  What it means

  This IP sits in a hosting / datacenter range. Platforms assume real people browse from home or a phone, and machines live in datacenters.

  Which uses care

  Cares most: AI services, Social sign-up, Gaming platforms, Cross-border e-commerce; Barely looks at it: Email sending

  Why it is weighted this way

  The most basic signal there is: scrapers, bulk sign-ups and fake traffic overwhelmingly come from datacenters, so risk systems discount the whole range. It says nothing about what you did, only that you share the range.

  Can it be fixed

  The range type cannot be changed. What helps is not stacking other issues on top: stay off blocklists, close unneeded ports, avoid crowded exits.

• −20

  rDNS looks like a proxy

  Reverse hostname google-proxy-66-102-8-225.google.com contains proxy/VPN keywords

  What it means

  The reverse hostname of this IP contains words like vpn or proxy: the carrier itself labels it a proxy exit.

  Which uses care

  Cares most: Email sending

  Why it is weighted this way

  A self-description by the operator is more trustworthy than a third-party guess, hence a sizable deduction.

  Can it be fixed

  Reverse DNS is set by the IP's owner; users cannot change it.

• −6

  Heavily shared exit

  3255 devices observed in the same subnet; higher risk of guilt by association

  What it means

  Many devices share this exit. Whatever others do on it gets attributed to you as well.

  Which uses care

  Cares most: Social sign-up, Streaming / short video, Cross-border e-commerce

  Why it is weighted this way

  Cross-border e-commerce and social sign-up care most: shared IPs are the leading cause of linked-account bans.

  Can it be fixed

  Move to a dedicated or low-share exit; sharing levels vary widely between plans from the same vendor.

• +3

  No open ports

  Network scans have not observed any open service on this IP

  What it means

  Network scanners have not observed any open service on this IP.

  Which uses care

  Barely looks at it: AI services

  Why it is weighted this way

  A small bonus: a small attack surface means fewer chances of ending up in scanner and abuse databases. Not evidence of home broadband; a well-firewalled server looks the same.

  Can it be fixed

  An inherent attribute of the IP or its range; nothing a user can change short of a different IP.

• +5

  Native IP

  Registered and used in the same country, allocated directly by a local carrier

  What it means

  Registered and used in the same country, allocated directly by a local carrier: a "native IP".

  Which uses care

  Cares most: Streaming / short video, Gaming platforms; Barely looks at it: Email sending

  Why it is weighted this way

  A bonus: region-based checks will not trip.

  Can it be fixed

  An inherent attribute of the IP or its range; nothing a user can change short of a different IP.

• +15

  Whitelisted IP

  Listed as an official address of a well-known service or crawler

  What it means

  This address is listed as the official IP of a well-known service or search engine.

  Which uses care

  All six uses treat it about the same, at the same weight as the overall score.

  Why it is weighted this way

  A bonus, and it also means this is nobody's egress, so scenario assessment does not apply.

  Can it be fixed

  An inherent attribute of the IP or its range; nothing a user can change short of a different IP.

Not listed on any of the 8 blocklists checked (Spamhaus ZEN, SpamCop, PSBL, blocklist.de, UCEPROTECT L1, s5h.net, DroneBL, SpamRats).

• abuseipdb abuse confidence 0%, 2 reports in 90 days

Each platform's internal risk labels

Platforms keep their own IP reputation data and ban records and do not publish them. No hit in public sources does not mean a platform has nothing on this IP.

Whether the IP is truly exclusive

Sharing is only the number of devices observed in the same subnet. It cannot show who else is using this exit right now, or what they are doing.

Which accounts this IP has been tied to

Account-to-IP links exist only inside each platform. Accounts previously banned on this IP are invisible to us.

Device, browser and behaviour

Risk systems look at IP + device fingerprint + behavioural rhythm together. A clean IP with an odd fingerprint or behaviour still gets blocked.

Whether the account profile matches the IP

When sign-up country, phone number, payment method, language or time zone disagree with the IP's location, platforms verify further. That is unrelated to IP purity.

• rdap
  97ms
• team-cymru
  30ms
• ip-api.com
  63ms
• proxycheck.io
  157ms
• abuseipdb
  126ms
• cloud-ranges
  12ms
• tor-exits
  12ms
• rdns
  527ms
• shodan-internetdb
  167ms
• dnsbl
  255ms

Machine-readable versions of this report: JSON · plain text · 中文报告