IP purity report
38.45.155.86
55/ 100
Suspicious
confidence: high
Mediocre reputation; not recommended for long-term use with important accounts.
Based on signals observed from public and partner data sources at 2026-09-26 11:14 UTC. This describes IP-level risk only; platforms' internal risk data is not visible to us.
- Proxy exit
Profile
What this IP is
- Country / region
- United States · California · Los Angeles
- IP type
- Business broadband
- Native / broadcast
- Native IP
- Network
- AS174 Cogent Communications
- Reverse DNS
- none
- Devices seen in subnet
- no data
Suitability
What it is good for
Each use case weighs the evidence differently; these are not one overall score.
AI services
ChatGPT · Claude · Gemini
Borderline
Main issue: Proxy IP
Least tolerant of data center and proxy exits: more likely to get degraded service, verification prompts or account limits. Spam history does not matter here
Social sign-up
X · Discord · Telegram · Reddit
Not recommended
Main issue: Proxy IP
Sign-up is the strictest checkpoint: data center / proxy exits are more likely to be asked for phone verification or refused, and IPs with bulk-registration history are blocked far more often
Streaming / short video
TikTok · Netflix · YouTube
Borderline
Main issue: Proxy IP
Native IP and low sharing matter most: a broadcast IP reads as a region mismatch, and shared exits get throttled
Gaming platforms
Steam · PSN · Epic · Nintendo
Borderline
Main issue: Proxy IP
Region locks, regional pricing and gifting all follow the IP's location, so broadcast IPs tend to be treated as cross-region; data center exits carry a high risk of restrictions
Cross-border e-commerce
Amazon · eBay · Shopee
Borderline
Main issue: Proxy IP
Linked-account store closures are driven first by shared IPs, and only then by data center ranges
Email sending
SMTP · marketing email
Not recommended
Main issue: Blocklist hit: s5h.net
Blocklists make or break deliverability, while sending from a data center IP is normal and is not penalised
Evidence
Why it got this score
- −15
Proxy IP
Only 1 data source flags it as a proxy; the evidence is limited, so it counts at half weight
- What it means
- A source marks this address as a proxy exit without saying whether it is a VPN, a datacenter proxy or something else.
- Which uses care
- Cares most: AI services, Social sign-up, Streaming / short video, Gaming platforms, Cross-border e-commerce
- Why it is weighted this way
- Only one source says so, so it counts at half weight.
- Can it be fixed
- These labels are usually applied to whole ranges and are hard to clear by behaviour; moving to an unlabeled range is the practical fix.
- −12
Blocklist hit: s5h.net
Listed by s5h.net
- What it means
- This IP is on a public blocklist. Most lists record addresses that sent spam or took part in scanning or attacks.
- Which uses care
- Cares most: Email sending; Barely looks at it: AI services, Social sign-up, Streaming / short video, Gaming platforms
- Why it is weighted this way
- A single aggregate list is moderate evidence, so about a dozen points; the email scenario more than doubles it because receiving servers query these lists directly.
- Can it be fixed
- Every list has a removal process, provided the cause is gone; some delist automatically after a quiet period.
- −10
1 open ports
Includes admin ports 22: clear evidence of a server rather than home broadband
- What it means
- Scanners see ports open on this IP. With admin ports such as 22 or 3389 it is almost certainly a server, not a home router.
- Which uses care
- Barely looks at it: AI services
- Why it is weighted this way
- Mainly corroboration that "this is a server", which the datacenter item already charged for, so only a few points here; AI-type scenarios weight it at 0.3 to avoid charging the same fact three times.
- Can it be fixed
- Close or restrict ports that do not need public access (firewall, non-default port, fail2ban); scanners update within days, then re-check. One of the few items you can change yourself.
- −5
Abuse reports (abuseipdb)
Confidence 10%, 2 reports in the last 90 days
- What it means
- Someone reported this IP to an abuse database (AbuseIPDB), typically for SSH brute force, port scanning or comment spam. The reporter may have seen a program on this machine, or a previous tenant.
- Which uses care
- Cares most: Social sign-up, Email sending
- Why it is weighted this way
- Counted at half the database's confidence. Sign-up scenarios care most: IPs with bulk-registration or credential-stuffing history are their first priority to block.
- Can it be fixed
- Reports age out; with no new reports for 90 days the score drops. If your machine is the one scanning, check for implanted software first.
- −5
No rDNS record
No PTR record; IPs allocated by established carriers usually have one
- What it means
- This IP has no reverse hostname (PTR record). Addresses allocated by established carriers usually have one.
- Which uses care
- Cares most: Email sending
- Why it is weighted this way
- A few points only: a missing PTR is a weak "unknown origin" signal, not a stain. Email cares more, since receiving servers check it.
- Can it be fixed
- Most hosts let you set a PTR in the control panel; set it to a sensible hostname.
- −3
IP type: Business broadband
Business broadband is broadly trusted, though a small share are proxy exits
- What it means
- A business broadband address: generally trusted, though some corporate exits are used as proxies.
- Which uses care
- Cares most: AI services, Social sign-up, Gaming platforms, Cross-border e-commerce; Barely looks at it: Email sending
- Why it is weighted this way
- A small deduction meaning "slightly less certain than residential".
- Can it be fixed
- An inherent attribute of the IP or its range; nothing a user can change short of a different IP.
- +5
Native IP
Registered and used in the same country, allocated directly by a local carrier
- What it means
- Registered and used in the same country, allocated directly by a local carrier: a "native IP".
- Which uses care
- Cares most: Streaming / short video, Gaming platforms; Barely looks at it: Email sending
- Why it is weighted this way
- A bonus: region-based checks will not trip.
- Can it be fixed
- An inherent attribute of the IP or its range; nothing a user can change short of a different IP.
Reputation
Blocklists and abuse history
Listed on 1 of 8 blocklists checked: s5h.net.
- abuseipdb abuse confidence 10%, 2 reports in 90 days
Open ports observed: 22
Limits
What an IP check cannot tell you
- Each platform's internal risk labels
- Platforms keep their own IP reputation data and ban records and do not publish them. No hit in public sources does not mean a platform has nothing on this IP.
- Whether the IP is truly exclusive
- Sharing is only the number of devices observed in the same subnet. It cannot show who else is using this exit right now, or what they are doing.
- Which accounts this IP has been tied to
- Account-to-IP links exist only inside each platform. Accounts previously banned on this IP are invisible to us.
- Device, browser and behaviour
- Risk systems look at IP + device fingerprint + behavioural rhythm together. A clean IP with an odd fingerprint or behaviour still gets blocked.
- Whether the account profile matches the IP
- When sign-up country, phone number, payment method, language or time zone disagree with the IP's location, platforms verify further. That is unrelated to IP purity.
Sources
Data sources and responses
- rdap299ms
- team-cymru131ms
- ip-api.com77ms
- proxycheck.io285ms
- abuseipdb439ms
- cloud-ranges15ms
- tor-exits15ms
- rdns39ms
- shodan-internetdb376ms
- ipwho.is419ms
- dnsbl266ms
Machine-readable versions of this report: JSON · plain text · 中文报告