IP purity report
36.12.244.203
69/ 100
Suspicious
confidence: high
Mediocre reputation; not recommended for long-term use with important accounts.
Based on signals observed from public and partner data sources at 2026-10-01 07:43 UTC. This describes IP-level risk only; platforms' internal risk data is not visible to us.
- Proxy exit
Profile
What this IP is
- Country / region
- Japan · Tokyo · Tokyo
- IP type
- Mobile network
- Native / broadcast
- Native IP
- Network
- AS2516 KDDI
- Reverse DNS
- KD036012244203.ppp-bb.dion.ne.jp
- Devices seen in subnet
- 42
Suitability
What it is good for
Each use case weighs the evidence differently; these are not one overall score.
AI services
ChatGPT · Claude · Gemini
Borderline
Main issue: Proxy IP
Least tolerant of data center and proxy exits: more likely to get degraded service, verification prompts or account limits. Spam history does not matter here
Social sign-up
X · Discord · Telegram · Reddit
Not recommended
Main issue: Proxy IP
Sign-up is the strictest checkpoint: data center / proxy exits are more likely to be asked for phone verification or refused, and IPs with bulk-registration history are blocked far more often
Streaming / short video
TikTok · Netflix · YouTube
Borderline
Main issue: Proxy IP
Native IP and low sharing matter most: a broadcast IP reads as a region mismatch, and shared exits get throttled
Gaming platforms
Steam · PSN · Epic · Nintendo
Borderline
Main issue: Proxy IP
Region locks, regional pricing and gifting all follow the IP's location, so broadcast IPs tend to be treated as cross-region; data center exits carry a high risk of restrictions
Cross-border e-commerce
Amazon · eBay · Shopee
Borderline
Main issue: Proxy IP
Linked-account store closures are driven first by shared IPs, and only then by data center ranges
Email sending
SMTP · marketing email
Borderline
Main issue: Proxy IP
Blocklists make or break deliverability, while sending from a data center IP is normal and is not penalised
Evidence
Why it got this score
- −30
Proxy IP
2 data sources flag it as a proxy exit, without identifying the type
- What it means
- A source marks this address as a proxy exit without saying whether it is a VPN, a datacenter proxy or something else.
- Which uses care
- Cares most: AI services, Social sign-up, Streaming / short video, Gaming platforms, Cross-border e-commerce
- Why it is weighted this way
- Two or more sources agree, so it counts in full, slightly lighter than a confirmed VPN because the type is unknown.
- Can it be fixed
- These labels are usually applied to whole ranges and are hard to clear by behaviour; moving to an unlabeled range is the practical fix.
- −12
Blocklist hit: DroneBL
Listed by DroneBL
- What it means
- This IP is on a public blocklist. Most lists record addresses that sent spam or took part in scanning or attacks.
- Which uses care
- Cares most: Email sending; Barely looks at it: AI services, Social sign-up, Streaming / short video, Gaming platforms
- Why it is weighted this way
- A single aggregate list is moderate evidence, so about a dozen points; the email scenario more than doubles it because receiving servers query these lists directly.
- Can it be fixed
- Every list has a removal process, provided the cause is gone; some delist automatically after a quiet period.
- −6
1 open ports
Open ports: 29842
- What it means
- Scanners see ports open on this IP. With admin ports such as 22 or 3389 it is almost certainly a server, not a home router.
- Which uses care
- Barely looks at it: AI services
- Why it is weighted this way
- Mainly corroboration that "this is a server", which the datacenter item already charged for, so only a few points here; AI-type scenarios weight it at 0.3 to avoid charging the same fact three times.
- Can it be fixed
- Close or restrict ports that do not need public access (firewall, non-default port, fail2ban); scanners update within days, then re-check. One of the few items you can change yourself.
- −4
1 known vulnerabilities
Mostly matched from software version banners; it shows the machine is unmaintained, and platform risk systems do not look at this directly: CVE-2014-4078
- What it means
- Scanners matched the version banners of exposed services to published CVE numbers. Most are just version matches, not confirmed exploitable holes.
- Which uses care
- Barely looks at it: AI services
- Why it is weighted this way
- It shows the machine is unmaintained, another sign of "server"; platform risk systems never count CVEs on an IP. Capped at 8 points (20 before 2026-09-26, which pushed ordinary VPS into "very high risk" for one fact charged three times).
- Can it be fixed
- Update the system and the services exposed to the internet (sshd above all); scanners update within days, then re-check.
- −1
Abuse reports (abuseipdb)
Confidence 1%, 2 reports in the last 90 days
- What it means
- Someone reported this IP to an abuse database (AbuseIPDB), typically for SSH brute force, port scanning or comment spam. The reporter may have seen a program on this machine, or a previous tenant.
- Which uses care
- Cares most: Social sign-up, Email sending
- Why it is weighted this way
- Counted at half the database's confidence. Sign-up scenarios care most: IPs with bulk-registration or credential-stuffing history are their first priority to block.
- Can it be fixed
- Reports age out; with no new reports for 90 days the score drops. If your machine is the one scanning, check for implanted software first.
- +5
IP type: Mobile network
Mobile IPs are heavily shared but are generally treated as real users
- What it means
- A residential, mobile, education or government network address: the kind of source risk systems trust most.
- Which uses care
- Cares most: AI services, Social sign-up, Gaming platforms, Cross-border e-commerce; Barely looks at it: Email sending
- Why it is weighted this way
- A bonus: the vast majority of real people come from these networks, so the default stance is to let them through.
- Can it be fixed
- An inherent attribute of the IP or its range; nothing a user can change short of a different IP.
- +5
Native IP
Registered and used in the same country, allocated directly by a local carrier
- What it means
- Registered and used in the same country, allocated directly by a local carrier: a "native IP".
- Which uses care
- Cares most: Streaming / short video, Gaming platforms; Barely looks at it: Email sending
- Why it is weighted this way
- A bonus: region-based checks will not trip.
- Can it be fixed
- An inherent attribute of the IP or its range; nothing a user can change short of a different IP.
- +6
Spamhaus ZEN: residential range declaration
PBL — range judged dynamic by Spamhaus
- What it means
- Spamhaus PBL declares this range as dynamic residential space that should not send mail directly. Not a stain: it is evidence of home broadband.
- Which uses care
- Cares most: Email sending; Barely looks at it: AI services, Social sign-up, Streaming / short video, Gaming platforms
- Why it is weighted this way
- Counted as a bonus because it indirectly confirms a real access network.
- Can it be fixed
- An inherent attribute of the IP or its range; nothing a user can change short of a different IP.
- +6
rDNS looks residential
Reverse hostname KD036012244203.ppp-bb.dion.ne.jp matches residential broadband naming
- What it means
- The reverse hostname follows residential naming (prefixes like dyn, pppoe, cust).
- Which uses care
- Cares most: Email sending
- Why it is weighted this way
- A bonus: the carrier's naming indirectly confirms an access network.
- Can it be fixed
- An inherent attribute of the IP or its range; nothing a user can change short of a different IP.
Reputation
Blocklists and abuse history
Listed on 1 of 8 blocklists checked: DroneBL.
- abuseipdb abuse confidence 1%, 2 reports in 90 days
Open ports observed: 29842
Limits
What an IP check cannot tell you
- Each platform's internal risk labels
- Platforms keep their own IP reputation data and ban records and do not publish them. No hit in public sources does not mean a platform has nothing on this IP.
- Whether the IP is truly exclusive
- Sharing is only the number of devices observed in the same subnet. It cannot show who else is using this exit right now, or what they are doing.
- Which accounts this IP has been tied to
- Account-to-IP links exist only inside each platform. Accounts previously banned on this IP are invisible to us.
- Device, browser and behaviour
- Risk systems look at IP + device fingerprint + behavioural rhythm together. A clean IP with an odd fingerprint or behaviour still gets blocked.
- Whether the account profile matches the IP
- When sign-up country, phone number, payment method, language or time zone disagree with the IP's location, platforms verify further. That is unrelated to IP purity.
Sources
Data sources and responses
- rdap336ms
- team-cymru100ms
- ip-api.com102ms
- proxycheck.io124ms
- abuseipdb168ms
- cloud-ranges18ms
- tor-exits18ms
- rdns891ms
- shodan-internetdb207ms
- dnsbl209ms
Machine-readable versions of this report: JSON · plain text · 中文报告