IPure IP purity check

IP purity report

219.28.235.62

86/ 100

Clean

confidence: high

Good reputation; at the IP level it rarely draws extra verification.

Based on signals observed from public and partner data sources at 2026-09-29 02:58 UTC. This describes IP-level risk only; platforms' internal risk data is not visible to us.

Profile

What this IP is

Country / region
Japan · Osaka · Osaka
IP type
Residential
Native / broadcast
Native IP
Network
AS17676 Japan nation-wide Network of SOFTBANK Corp.
Reverse DNS
softbank219028235062.bbtec.net
Devices seen in subnet
no data

Suitability

What it is good for

Each use case weighs the evidence differently; these are not one overall score.

AI services

ChatGPT · Claude · Gemini

59

Borderline

Main issue: Proxy IP

Least tolerant of data center and proxy exits: more likely to get degraded service, verification prompts or account limits. Spam history does not matter here

Social sign-up

X · Discord · Telegram · Reddit

58

Borderline

Main issue: Proxy IP

Sign-up is the strictest checkpoint: data center / proxy exits are more likely to be asked for phone verification or refused, and IPs with bulk-registration history are blocked far more often

Streaming / short video

TikTok · Netflix · YouTube

70

Good fit

Main issue: Proxy IP

Native IP and low sharing matter most: a broadcast IP reads as a region mismatch, and shared exits get throttled

Gaming platforms

Steam · PSN · Epic · Nintendo

69

Borderline

Main issue: Proxy IP

Region locks, regional pricing and gifting all follow the IP's location, so broadcast IPs tend to be treated as cross-region; data center exits carry a high risk of restrictions

Cross-border e-commerce

Amazon · eBay · Shopee

74

Good fit

Main issue: Proxy IP

Linked-account store closures are driven first by shared IPs, and only then by data center ranges

Email sending

SMTP · marketing email

77

Good fit

Main issue: Proxy IP

Blocklists make or break deliverability, while sending from a data center IP is normal and is not penalised

Evidence

Why it got this score

  • −30

    Proxy IP

    2 data sources flag it as a proxy exit, without identifying the type

    What it means
    A source marks this address as a proxy exit without saying whether it is a VPN, a datacenter proxy or something else.
    Which uses care
    Cares most: AI services, Social sign-up, Streaming / short video, Gaming platforms, Cross-border e-commerce
    Why it is weighted this way
    Two or more sources agree, so it counts in full, slightly lighter than a confirmed VPN because the type is unknown.
    Can it be fixed
    These labels are usually applied to whole ranges and are hard to clear by behaviour; moving to an unlabeled range is the practical fix.
  • +3

    No open ports

    Network scans have not observed any open service on this IP

    What it means
    Network scanners have not observed any open service on this IP.
    Which uses care
    Barely looks at it: AI services
    Why it is weighted this way
    A small bonus: a small attack surface means fewer chances of ending up in scanner and abuse databases. Not evidence of home broadband; a well-firewalled server looks the same.
    Can it be fixed
    An inherent attribute of the IP or its range; nothing a user can change short of a different IP.
  • +5

    Native IP

    Registered and used in the same country, allocated directly by a local carrier

    What it means
    Registered and used in the same country, allocated directly by a local carrier: a "native IP".
    Which uses care
    Cares most: Streaming / short video, Gaming platforms; Barely looks at it: Email sending
    Why it is weighted this way
    A bonus: region-based checks will not trip.
    Can it be fixed
    An inherent attribute of the IP or its range; nothing a user can change short of a different IP.
  • +8

    IP type: Residential

    Residential broadband is the IP type risk systems trust most

    What it means
    A residential, mobile, education or government network address: the kind of source risk systems trust most.
    Which uses care
    Cares most: AI services, Social sign-up, Gaming platforms, Cross-border e-commerce; Barely looks at it: Email sending
    Why it is weighted this way
    A bonus: the vast majority of real people come from these networks, so the default stance is to let them through.
    Can it be fixed
    An inherent attribute of the IP or its range; nothing a user can change short of a different IP.

Reputation

Blocklists and abuse history

Not listed on any of the 8 blocklists checked (Spamhaus ZEN, SpamCop, PSBL, blocklist.de, UCEPROTECT L1, s5h.net, DroneBL, SpamRats).

  • abuseipdb abuse confidence 0%

Limits

What an IP check cannot tell you

Each platform's internal risk labels
Platforms keep their own IP reputation data and ban records and do not publish them. No hit in public sources does not mean a platform has nothing on this IP.
Whether the IP is truly exclusive
Sharing is only the number of devices observed in the same subnet. It cannot show who else is using this exit right now, or what they are doing.
Which accounts this IP has been tied to
Account-to-IP links exist only inside each platform. Accounts previously banned on this IP are invisible to us.
Device, browser and behaviour
Risk systems look at IP + device fingerprint + behavioural rhythm together. A clean IP with an odd fingerprint or behaviour still gets blocked.
Whether the account profile matches the IP
When sign-up country, phone number, payment method, language or time zone disagree with the IP's location, platforms verify further. That is unrelated to IP purity.

Sources

Data sources and responses

  • rdap
    142ms
  • team-cymru
    68ms
  • ip-api.com
    94ms
  • proxycheck.io
    163ms
  • abuseipdb
    157ms
  • cloud-ranges
    10ms
  • tor-exits
    10ms
  • rdns
    815ms
  • shodan-internetdb
    176ms
  • ipwho.is
    78ms
  • dnsbl
    214ms

Machine-readable versions of this report: JSON · plain text · 中文报告