IPure IP purity check

IP purity report

195.178.110.131

0/ 100

Very high risk

confidence: low

Reputation is burned; almost every platform will block it.

Based on signals observed from public and partner data sources at 2026-09-24 00:46 UTC. This describes IP-level risk only; platforms' internal risk data is not visible to us.

Profile

What this IP is

Country / region
Andorra · Andorra la Vella · Andorra la Vella
IP type
Hosting / data center
Native / broadcast
Native IP
Network
AS48090 Techoff SRV Limited
Reverse DNS
none
Devices seen in subnet
379

Suitability

What it is good for

Each use case weighs the evidence differently; these are not one overall score.

AI services

ChatGPT · Claude · Gemini

0

Best avoided

Main issue: IP type: Hosting / data center

Least tolerant of data center and proxy exits: more likely to get degraded service, verification prompts or account limits. Spam history does not matter here

Social sign-up

X · Discord · Telegram · Reddit

0

Best avoided

Main issue: Abuse reports (abuseipdb)

Sign-up is the strictest checkpoint: data center / proxy exits are more likely to be asked for phone verification or refused, and IPs with bulk-registration history are blocked far more often

Streaming / short video

TikTok · Netflix · YouTube

0

Best avoided

Main issue: Abuse reports (abuseipdb)

Native IP and low sharing matter most: a broadcast IP reads as a region mismatch, and shared exits get throttled

Gaming platforms

Steam · PSN · Epic · Nintendo

0

Best avoided

Main issue: Abuse reports (abuseipdb)

Region locks, regional pricing and gifting all follow the IP's location, so broadcast IPs tend to be treated as cross-region; data center exits carry a high risk of restrictions

Cross-border e-commerce

Amazon · eBay · Shopee

0

Best avoided

Main issue: Abuse reports (abuseipdb)

Linked-account store closures are driven first by shared IPs, and only then by data center ranges

Email sending

SMTP · marketing email

0

Best avoided

Main issue: Blocklist hit: Spamhaus ZEN

Blocklists make or break deliverability, while sending from a data center IP is normal and is not penalised

Evidence

Why it got this score

  • −50

    Abuse reports (abuseipdb)

    Confidence 100%, 393 reports in the last 90 days

  • −45

    Blocklist hit: Spamhaus ZEN

    SBL — known spam source; SBL DROP — recommended to drop the whole range

  • −25

    IP type: Hosting / data center

    Hosting / data center IPs are the main source of automated traffic

  • −15

    Proxy IP

    Only 1 data source flags it as a proxy; the evidence is limited, so it counts at half weight

  • −12

    Blocklist hit: blocklist.de

    Listed by blocklist.de

  • −12

    Blocklist hit: s5h.net

    Listed by s5h.net

  • −12

    Blocklist hit: DroneBL

    Listed by DroneBL

  • −12

    Blocklist hit: SpamRats

    Listed by SpamRats

  • −12

    Attack activity on record

    111 events recorded: Vulnerability Probing ×106, Login Attempt ×4, Registration Attempt ×1

  • −10

    6 open ports

    Includes admin ports 22: clear evidence of a server rather than home broadband

  • −6

    Heavily shared exit

    379 devices observed in the same subnet; higher risk of guilt by association

  • −5

    No rDNS record

    No PTR record; IPs allocated by established carriers usually have one

  • +5

    Native IP

    Registered and used in the same country, allocated directly by a local carrier

Reputation

Blocklists and abuse history

Listed on 5 of 8 blocklists checked: Spamhaus ZEN, blocklist.de, s5h.net, DroneBL, SpamRats.

  • proxycheck.io 111 attack events recorded
  • abuseipdb abuse confidence 100%, 393 reports in 90 days

Open ports observed: 22, 80, 443, 1337, 5060, 8080

Limits

What an IP check cannot tell you

Each platform's internal risk labels
Platforms keep their own IP reputation data and ban records and do not publish them. No hit in public sources does not mean a platform has nothing on this IP.
Whether the IP is truly exclusive
Sharing is only the number of devices observed in the same subnet. It cannot show who else is using this exit right now, or what they are doing.
Which accounts this IP has been tied to
Account-to-IP links exist only inside each platform. Accounts previously banned on this IP are invisible to us.
Device, browser and behaviour
Risk systems look at IP + device fingerprint + behavioural rhythm together. A clean IP with an odd fingerprint or behaviour still gets blocked.
Whether the account profile matches the IP
When sign-up country, phone number, payment method, language or time zone disagree with the IP's location, platforms verify further. That is unrelated to IP purity.

Sources

Data sources and responses

  • rdap
    870ms
  • team-cymru
    57ms
  • ip-api.com
    78ms
  • proxycheck.io
    170ms
  • abuseipdb
    169ms
  • cloud-ranges
    10ms
  • tor-exits
    10ms
  • rdns
    329ms
  • shodan-internetdb
    106ms
  • ipwho.is
    82ms
  • dnsbl
    266ms

Machine-readable versions of this report: JSON · plain text · 中文报告