190.61.45.106

Country / region

Colombia · Bogota D.C. · Bogotá

IP type

Residential

Native / broadcast

Native IP

Network

AS52468 UFINET

Reverse DNS

106-45-61-190.ufinet.com.co

Devices seen in subnet

42

• −27

  Abuse reports (abuseipdb)

  Confidence 53%, 32 reports in the last 90 days

  What it means

  Someone reported this IP to an abuse database (AbuseIPDB), typically for SSH brute force, port scanning or comment spam. The reporter may have seen a program on this machine, or a previous tenant.

  Which uses care

  Cares most: Social sign-up, Email sending

  Why it is weighted this way

  Counted at half the database's confidence. Sign-up scenarios care most: IPs with bulk-registration or credential-stuffing history are their first priority to block.

  Can it be fixed

  Reports age out; with no new reports for 90 days the score drops. If your machine is the one scanning, check for implanted software first.

• −15

  Proxy IP

  Only 1 data source flags it as a proxy; the evidence is limited, so it counts at half weight

  What it means

  A source marks this address as a proxy exit without saying whether it is a VPN, a datacenter proxy or something else.

  Which uses care

  Cares most: AI services, Social sign-up, Streaming / short video, Gaming platforms, Cross-border e-commerce

  Why it is weighted this way

  Only one source says so, so it counts at half weight.

  Can it be fixed

  These labels are usually applied to whole ranges and are hard to clear by behaviour; moving to an unlabeled range is the practical fix.

• −6

  2 open ports

  Open ports: 1723, 2000

  What it means

  Scanners see ports open on this IP. With admin ports such as 22 or 3389 it is almost certainly a server, not a home router.

  Which uses care

  Barely looks at it: AI services

  Why it is weighted this way

  Mainly corroboration that "this is a server", which the datacenter item already charged for, so only a few points here; AI-type scenarios weight it at 0.3 to avoid charging the same fact three times.

  Can it be fixed

  Close or restrict ports that do not need public access (firewall, non-default port, fail2ban); scanners update within days, then re-check. One of the few items you can change yourself.

• −3

  Attack activity on record

  1 events recorded: Login Attempt ×1

  What it means

  A commercial risk database recorded attacks from this IP: credential stuffing, bulk registration, comment spam and the like.

  Which uses care

  Cares most: Social sign-up, Email sending

  Why it is weighted this way

  Tiered by count rather than linear: 1 and 8 are about the same (someone used it), hundreds are a different story. The cap is kept low because the same record already feeds that vendor's overall score.

  Can it be fixed

  Same as abuse reports: stop the source and the record fades with time.

• +5

  Native IP

  Registered and used in the same country, allocated directly by a local carrier

  What it means

  Registered and used in the same country, allocated directly by a local carrier: a "native IP".

  Which uses care

  Cares most: Streaming / short video, Gaming platforms; Barely looks at it: Email sending

  Why it is weighted this way

  A bonus: region-based checks will not trip.

  Can it be fixed

  An inherent attribute of the IP or its range; nothing a user can change short of a different IP.

• +6

  Spamhaus ZEN: residential range declaration

  PBL — range declared residential/dynamic by the carrier

  What it means

  Spamhaus PBL declares this range as dynamic residential space that should not send mail directly. Not a stain: it is evidence of home broadband.

  Which uses care

  Cares most: Email sending; Barely looks at it: AI services, Social sign-up, Streaming / short video, Gaming platforms

  Why it is weighted this way

  Counted as a bonus because it indirectly confirms a real access network.

  Can it be fixed

  An inherent attribute of the IP or its range; nothing a user can change short of a different IP.

• +8

  IP type: Residential

  Residential broadband is the IP type risk systems trust most

  What it means

  A residential, mobile, education or government network address: the kind of source risk systems trust most.

  Which uses care

  Cares most: AI services, Social sign-up, Gaming platforms, Cross-border e-commerce; Barely looks at it: Email sending

  Why it is weighted this way

  A bonus: the vast majority of real people come from these networks, so the default stance is to let them through.

  Can it be fixed

  An inherent attribute of the IP or its range; nothing a user can change short of a different IP.

Not listed on any of the 8 blocklists checked (Spamhaus ZEN, SpamCop, PSBL, blocklist.de, UCEPROTECT L1, s5h.net, DroneBL, SpamRats).

• proxycheck.io 1 attack events recorded
• abuseipdb abuse confidence 53%, 32 reports in 90 days

Open ports observed: 1723, 2000

Each platform's internal risk labels

Platforms keep their own IP reputation data and ban records and do not publish them. No hit in public sources does not mean a platform has nothing on this IP.

Whether the IP is truly exclusive

Sharing is only the number of devices observed in the same subnet. It cannot show who else is using this exit right now, or what they are doing.

Which accounts this IP has been tied to

Account-to-IP links exist only inside each platform. Accounts previously banned on this IP are invisible to us.

Device, browser and behaviour

Risk systems look at IP + device fingerprint + behavioural rhythm together. A clean IP with an odd fingerprint or behaviour still gets blocked.

Whether the account profile matches the IP

When sign-up country, phone number, payment method, language or time zone disagree with the IP's location, platforms verify further. That is unrelated to IP purity.

• rdap
  937ms
• team-cymru
  61ms
• ip-api.com
  119ms
• proxycheck.io
  362ms
• abuseipdb
  485ms
• cloud-ranges
  19ms
• tor-exits
  19ms
• rdns
  504ms
• shodan-internetdb
  351ms
• ipwho.is
  312ms
• dnsbl
  858ms

Machine-readable versions of this report: JSON · plain text · 中文报告