IP purity report
167.17.69.120
14/ 100
Very high risk
confidence: high
Reputation is burned; almost every platform will block it.
Based on signals observed from public and partner data sources at 2026-09-26 11:23 UTC. This describes IP-level risk only; platforms' internal risk data is not visible to us.
- VPN exit
Profile
What this IP is
- Country / region
- United States · New York · New York
- IP type
- Hosting / data center
- Native / broadcast
- Broadcast IP
- Network
- AS63023 GTHost
- Reverse DNS
- 120-69-17-167.clients.gthost.com
- Devices seen in subnet
- 59
Suitability
What it is good for
Each use case weighs the evidence differently; these are not one overall score.
AI services
ChatGPT · Claude · Gemini
Best avoided
Main issue: IP type: Hosting / data center
Least tolerant of data center and proxy exits: more likely to get degraded service, verification prompts or account limits. Spam history does not matter here
Social sign-up
X · Discord · Telegram · Reddit
Best avoided
Main issue: IP type: Hosting / data center
Sign-up is the strictest checkpoint: data center / proxy exits are more likely to be asked for phone verification or refused, and IPs with bulk-registration history are blocked far more often
Streaming / short video
TikTok · Netflix · YouTube
Best avoided
Main issue: Known VPN exit
Native IP and low sharing matter most: a broadcast IP reads as a region mismatch, and shared exits get throttled
Gaming platforms
Steam · PSN · Epic · Nintendo
Best avoided
Main issue: IP type: Hosting / data center
Region locks, regional pricing and gifting all follow the IP's location, so broadcast IPs tend to be treated as cross-region; data center exits carry a high risk of restrictions
Cross-border e-commerce
Amazon · eBay · Shopee
Best avoided
Main issue: IP type: Hosting / data center
Linked-account store closures are driven first by shared IPs, and only then by data center ranges
Email sending
SMTP · marketing email
Best avoided
Main issue: Blocklist hit: s5h.net
Blocklists make or break deliverability, while sending from a data center IP is normal and is not penalised
Evidence
Why it got this score
- −25
IP type: Hosting / data center
Hosting / data center IPs are the main source of automated traffic
- What it means
- This IP sits in a hosting / datacenter range. Platforms assume real people browse from home or a phone, and machines live in datacenters.
- Which uses care
- Cares most: AI services, Social sign-up, Gaming platforms, Cross-border e-commerce; Barely looks at it: Email sending
- Why it is weighted this way
- The most basic signal there is: scrapers, bulk sign-ups and fake traffic overwhelmingly come from datacenters, so risk systems discount the whole range. It says nothing about what you did, only that you share the range.
- Can it be fixed
- The range type cannot be changed. What helps is not stacking other issues on top: stay off blocklists, close unneeded ports, avoid crowded exits.
- −20
Known VPN exit
Only 1 data source flags it as a VPN; the evidence is limited, so it counts at half weight
- What it means
- Commercial risk databases mark this address as a VPN server exit. Platforms see "someone on a VPN", not you.
- Which uses care
- Cares most: AI services, Social sign-up, Streaming / short video, Gaming platforms, Cross-border e-commerce
- Why it is weighted this way
- Only one source says so, and a single database can be wrong (public DNS resolvers have been mislabeled), so it counts at half weight. If a second source follows in a few days, this item doubles.
- Can it be fixed
- Self-hosted proxies on VPS ranges are often labeled block-wide; changing the IP is the only fix. Commercial VPN exits are labeled by design.
- −15
Broadcast IP
Range registered in CA but used in US (announced across borders)
- What it means
- The country the range is registered in differs from where it is actually used. Common when an international host uses a range registered in country A inside country B, or when a proxy vendor leases ranges.
- Which uses care
- Cares most: Streaming / short video, Gaming platforms; Barely looks at it: Email sending
- Why it is weighted this way
- Region-sensitive platforms (streaming, region-locked gaming) care most: they cross-check several geo databases and treat a mismatch as "wrong region". Little effect on scenarios that ignore region.
- Can it be fixed
- This is a registration attribute of the range and cannot be changed by the user. Platforms use different geo databases, so some may not notice at all.
- −12
Blocklist hit: s5h.net
Listed by s5h.net
- What it means
- This IP is on a public blocklist. Most lists record addresses that sent spam or took part in scanning or attacks.
- Which uses care
- Cares most: Email sending; Barely looks at it: AI services, Social sign-up, Streaming / short video, Gaming platforms
- Why it is weighted this way
- A single aggregate list is moderate evidence, so about a dozen points; the email scenario more than doubles it because receiving servers query these lists directly.
- Can it be fixed
- Every list has a removal process, provided the cause is gone; some delist automatically after a quiet period.
- −10
1 open ports
Includes admin ports 22: clear evidence of a server rather than home broadband
- What it means
- Scanners see ports open on this IP. With admin ports such as 22 or 3389 it is almost certainly a server, not a home router.
- Which uses care
- Barely looks at it: AI services
- Why it is weighted this way
- Mainly corroboration that "this is a server", which the datacenter item already charged for, so only a few points here; AI-type scenarios weight it at 0.3 to avoid charging the same fact three times.
- Can it be fixed
- Close or restrict ports that do not need public access (firewall, non-default port, fail2ban); scanners update within days, then re-check. One of the few items you can change yourself.
- −3
Shared exit
59 devices observed in the same subnet
- What it means
- Many devices share this exit. Whatever others do on it gets attributed to you as well.
- Which uses care
- Cares most: Social sign-up, Streaming / short video, Cross-border e-commerce
- Why it is weighted this way
- Cross-border e-commerce and social sign-up care most: shared IPs are the leading cause of linked-account bans.
- Can it be fixed
- Move to a dedicated or low-share exit; sharing levels vary widely between plans from the same vendor.
- −1
Abuse reports (abuseipdb)
Confidence 2%, 4 reports in the last 90 days
- What it means
- Someone reported this IP to an abuse database (AbuseIPDB), typically for SSH brute force, port scanning or comment spam. The reporter may have seen a program on this machine, or a previous tenant.
- Which uses care
- Cares most: Social sign-up, Email sending
- Why it is weighted this way
- Counted at half the database's confidence. Sign-up scenarios care most: IPs with bulk-registration or credential-stuffing history are their first priority to block.
- Can it be fixed
- Reports age out; with no new reports for 90 days the score drops. If your machine is the one scanning, check for implanted software first.
Reputation
Blocklists and abuse history
Listed on 1 of 8 blocklists checked: s5h.net.
- abuseipdb abuse confidence 2%, 4 reports in 90 days
Open ports observed: 22
Limits
What an IP check cannot tell you
- Each platform's internal risk labels
- Platforms keep their own IP reputation data and ban records and do not publish them. No hit in public sources does not mean a platform has nothing on this IP.
- Whether the IP is truly exclusive
- Sharing is only the number of devices observed in the same subnet. It cannot show who else is using this exit right now, or what they are doing.
- Which accounts this IP has been tied to
- Account-to-IP links exist only inside each platform. Accounts previously banned on this IP are invisible to us.
- Device, browser and behaviour
- Risk systems look at IP + device fingerprint + behavioural rhythm together. A clean IP with an odd fingerprint or behaviour still gets blocked.
- Whether the account profile matches the IP
- When sign-up country, phone number, payment method, language or time zone disagree with the IP's location, platforms verify further. That is unrelated to IP purity.
Sources
Data sources and responses
- rdap328ms
- team-cymru67ms
- ip-api.com88ms
- proxycheck.io177ms
- abuseipdb229ms
- cloud-ranges15ms
- tor-exits15ms
- rdns873ms
- shodan-internetdb199ms
- ipwho.is160ms
- dnsbl203ms
Machine-readable versions of this report: JSON · plain text · 中文报告