IP purity report
154.92.130.35
100/ 100
Excellent
confidence: high
No risk signals found in any dimension we check; the IP itself is not an obstacle.
Based on signals observed from public and partner data sources at 2026-09-29 15:29 UTC. This describes IP-level risk only; platforms' internal risk data is not visible to us.
Profile
What this IP is
- Country / region
- Hong Kong · Central and Western · Mid Levels
- IP type
- Mobile network
- Native / broadcast
- Native IP
- Network
- AS398704 Stacks Inc
- Reverse DNS
- none
- Devices seen in subnet
- 67
Suitability
What it is good for
Each use case weighs the evidence differently; these are not one overall score.
AI services
ChatGPT · Claude · Gemini
Region not supported
ChatGPT / Claude / Gemini are not offered in this region and it cannot connect directly; a clean IP in a supported region is needed
Least tolerant of data center and proxy exits: more likely to get degraded service, verification prompts or account limits. Spam history does not matter here
Social sign-up
X · Discord · Telegram · Reddit
Excellent fit
No notable obstacle found for this use case
Sign-up is the strictest checkpoint: data center / proxy exits are more likely to be asked for phone verification or refused, and IPs with bulk-registration history are blocked far more often
Streaming / short video
TikTok · Netflix · YouTube
Excellent fit
No notable obstacle found for this use case
Native IP and low sharing matter most: a broadcast IP reads as a region mismatch, and shared exits get throttled
Gaming platforms
Steam · PSN · Epic · Nintendo
Excellent fit
No notable obstacle found for this use case
Region locks, regional pricing and gifting all follow the IP's location, so broadcast IPs tend to be treated as cross-region; data center exits carry a high risk of restrictions
Cross-border e-commerce
Amazon · eBay · Shopee
Excellent fit
No notable obstacle found for this use case
Linked-account store closures are driven first by shared IPs, and only then by data center ranges
Email sending
SMTP · marketing email
Excellent fit
No notable obstacle found for this use case
Blocklists make or break deliverability, while sending from a data center IP is normal and is not penalised
Evidence
Why it got this score
- −5
No rDNS record
No PTR record; IPs allocated by established carriers usually have one
- What it means
- This IP has no reverse hostname (PTR record). Addresses allocated by established carriers usually have one.
- Which uses care
- Cares most: Email sending
- Why it is weighted this way
- A few points only: a missing PTR is a weak "unknown origin" signal, not a stain. Email cares more, since receiving servers check it.
- Can it be fixed
- Most hosts let you set a PTR in the control panel; set it to a sensible hostname.
- −3
Shared exit
67 devices observed in the same subnet
- What it means
- Many devices share this exit. Whatever others do on it gets attributed to you as well.
- Which uses care
- Cares most: Social sign-up, Streaming / short video, Cross-border e-commerce
- Why it is weighted this way
- Cross-border e-commerce and social sign-up care most: shared IPs are the leading cause of linked-account bans.
- Can it be fixed
- Move to a dedicated or low-share exit; sharing levels vary widely between plans from the same vendor.
- +3
No open ports
Network scans have not observed any open service on this IP
- What it means
- Network scanners have not observed any open service on this IP.
- Which uses care
- Barely looks at it: AI services
- Why it is weighted this way
- A small bonus: a small attack surface means fewer chances of ending up in scanner and abuse databases. Not evidence of home broadband; a well-firewalled server looks the same.
- Can it be fixed
- An inherent attribute of the IP or its range; nothing a user can change short of a different IP.
- +5
IP type: Mobile network
Mobile IPs are heavily shared but are generally treated as real users
- What it means
- A residential, mobile, education or government network address: the kind of source risk systems trust most.
- Which uses care
- Cares most: AI services, Social sign-up, Gaming platforms, Cross-border e-commerce; Barely looks at it: Email sending
- Why it is weighted this way
- A bonus: the vast majority of real people come from these networks, so the default stance is to let them through.
- Can it be fixed
- An inherent attribute of the IP or its range; nothing a user can change short of a different IP.
- +5
Native IP
Registered and used in the same country, allocated directly by a local carrier
- What it means
- Registered and used in the same country, allocated directly by a local carrier: a "native IP".
- Which uses care
- Cares most: Streaming / short video, Gaming platforms; Barely looks at it: Email sending
- Why it is weighted this way
- A bonus: region-based checks will not trip.
- Can it be fixed
- An inherent attribute of the IP or its range; nothing a user can change short of a different IP.
Reputation
Blocklists and abuse history
Not listed on any of the 8 blocklists checked (Spamhaus ZEN, SpamCop, PSBL, blocklist.de, UCEPROTECT L1, s5h.net, DroneBL, SpamRats).
- abuseipdb abuse confidence 0%, 1 reports in 90 days
Limits
What an IP check cannot tell you
- Each platform's internal risk labels
- Platforms keep their own IP reputation data and ban records and do not publish them. No hit in public sources does not mean a platform has nothing on this IP.
- Whether the IP is truly exclusive
- Sharing is only the number of devices observed in the same subnet. It cannot show who else is using this exit right now, or what they are doing.
- Which accounts this IP has been tied to
- Account-to-IP links exist only inside each platform. Accounts previously banned on this IP are invisible to us.
- Device, browser and behaviour
- Risk systems look at IP + device fingerprint + behavioural rhythm together. A clean IP with an odd fingerprint or behaviour still gets blocked.
- Whether the account profile matches the IP
- When sign-up country, phone number, payment method, language or time zone disagree with the IP's location, platforms verify further. That is unrelated to IP purity.
Sources
Data sources and responses
- rdap754ms
- team-cymru53ms
- ip-api.com70ms
- proxycheck.io145ms
- abuseipdb211ms
- cloud-ranges12ms
- tor-exits12ms
- rdns21ms
- shodan-internetdb252ms
- dnsbl1006ms
Machine-readable versions of this report: JSON · plain text · 中文报告