153.134.150.194

Country / region

Japan · Tokyo · Senzoku

IP type

Mobile network

Native / broadcast

Native IP

Network

AS4713 Open Computer Network

Reverse DNS

p11894194-ipxg44701marunouchi.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp

Devices seen in subnet

14

• −30

  Proxy IP

  2 data sources flag it as a proxy exit, without identifying the type

  What it means

  A source marks this address as a proxy exit without saying whether it is a VPN, a datacenter proxy or something else.

  Which uses care

  Cares most: AI services, Social sign-up, Streaming / short video, Gaming platforms, Cross-border e-commerce

  Why it is weighted this way

  Two or more sources agree, so it counts in full, slightly lighter than a confirmed VPN because the type is unknown.

  Can it be fixed

  These labels are usually applied to whole ranges and are hard to clear by behaviour; moving to an unlabeled range is the practical fix.

• −5

  Abuse reports (abuseipdb)

  Confidence 9%, 2 reports in the last 90 days

  What it means

  Someone reported this IP to an abuse database (AbuseIPDB), typically for SSH brute force, port scanning or comment spam. The reporter may have seen a program on this machine, or a previous tenant.

  Which uses care

  Cares most: Social sign-up, Email sending

  Why it is weighted this way

  Counted at half the database's confidence. Sign-up scenarios care most: IPs with bulk-registration or credential-stuffing history are their first priority to block.

  Can it be fixed

  Reports age out; with no new reports for 90 days the score drops. If your machine is the one scanning, check for implanted software first.

• +3

  No open ports

  Network scans have not observed any open service on this IP

  What it means

  Network scanners have not observed any open service on this IP.

  Which uses care

  Barely looks at it: AI services

  Why it is weighted this way

  A small bonus: a small attack surface means fewer chances of ending up in scanner and abuse databases. Not evidence of home broadband; a well-firewalled server looks the same.

  Can it be fixed

  An inherent attribute of the IP or its range; nothing a user can change short of a different IP.

• +5

  IP type: Mobile network

  Mobile IPs are heavily shared but are generally treated as real users

  What it means

  A residential, mobile, education or government network address: the kind of source risk systems trust most.

  Which uses care

  Cares most: AI services, Social sign-up, Gaming platforms, Cross-border e-commerce; Barely looks at it: Email sending

  Why it is weighted this way

  A bonus: the vast majority of real people come from these networks, so the default stance is to let them through.

  Can it be fixed

  An inherent attribute of the IP or its range; nothing a user can change short of a different IP.

• +5

  Native IP

  Registered and used in the same country, allocated directly by a local carrier

  What it means

  Registered and used in the same country, allocated directly by a local carrier: a "native IP".

  Which uses care

  Cares most: Streaming / short video, Gaming platforms; Barely looks at it: Email sending

  Why it is weighted this way

  A bonus: region-based checks will not trip.

  Can it be fixed

  An inherent attribute of the IP or its range; nothing a user can change short of a different IP.

• +6

  Spamhaus ZEN: residential range declaration

  PBL — range judged dynamic by Spamhaus

  What it means

  Spamhaus PBL declares this range as dynamic residential space that should not send mail directly. Not a stain: it is evidence of home broadband.

  Which uses care

  Cares most: Email sending; Barely looks at it: AI services, Social sign-up, Streaming / short video, Gaming platforms

  Why it is weighted this way

  Counted as a bonus because it indirectly confirms a real access network.

  Can it be fixed

  An inherent attribute of the IP or its range; nothing a user can change short of a different IP.

Not listed on any of the 8 blocklists checked (Spamhaus ZEN, SpamCop, PSBL, blocklist.de, UCEPROTECT L1, s5h.net, DroneBL, SpamRats).

• abuseipdb abuse confidence 9%, 2 reports in 90 days

Each platform's internal risk labels

Platforms keep their own IP reputation data and ban records and do not publish them. No hit in public sources does not mean a platform has nothing on this IP.

Whether the IP is truly exclusive

Sharing is only the number of devices observed in the same subnet. It cannot show who else is using this exit right now, or what they are doing.

Which accounts this IP has been tied to

Account-to-IP links exist only inside each platform. Accounts previously banned on this IP are invisible to us.

Device, browser and behaviour

Risk systems look at IP + device fingerprint + behavioural rhythm together. A clean IP with an odd fingerprint or behaviour still gets blocked.

Whether the account profile matches the IP

When sign-up country, phone number, payment method, language or time zone disagree with the IP's location, platforms verify further. That is unrelated to IP purity.

• rdap
  214ms
• team-cymru
  17ms
• ip-api.com
  64ms
• proxycheck.io
  165ms
• abuseipdb
  162ms
• cloud-ranges
  8ms
• tor-exits
  8ms
• rdns
  14ms
• shodan-internetdb
  78ms
• ipwho.is
  68ms
• dnsbl
  194ms

Machine-readable versions of this report: JSON · plain text · 中文报告