IPure IP purity check

IP purity report

14.152.91.194

33/ 100

High risk

confidence: high

Most platforms will add verification or block outright; consider replacing it.

Based on signals observed from public and partner data sources at 2026-09-29 09:50 UTC. This describes IP-level risk only; platforms' internal risk data is not visible to us.

Profile

What this IP is

Country / region
China · Guangdong · Guangzhou
IP type
Residential
Native / broadcast
Native IP
Network
AS134763 Chinanet GD
Reverse DNS
none
Devices seen in subnet
14

Suitability

What it is good for

Each use case weighs the evidence differently; these are not one overall score.

AI services

ChatGPT · Claude · Gemini

—

Region not supported

ChatGPT / Claude / Gemini are not offered in this region and it cannot connect directly; a clean IP in a supported region is needed

Least tolerant of data center and proxy exits: more likely to get degraded service, verification prompts or account limits. Spam history does not matter here

Social sign-up

X · Discord · Telegram · Reddit

0

Best avoided

Main issue: Proxy IP

Sign-up is the strictest checkpoint: data center / proxy exits are more likely to be asked for phone verification or refused, and IPs with bulk-registration history are blocked far more often

Streaming / short video

TikTok · Netflix · YouTube

21

Best avoided

Main issue: Proxy IP

Native IP and low sharing matter most: a broadcast IP reads as a region mismatch, and shared exits get throttled

Gaming platforms

Steam · PSN · Epic · Nintendo

29

Not recommended

Main issue: Proxy IP

Region locks, regional pricing and gifting all follow the IP's location, so broadcast IPs tend to be treated as cross-region; data center exits carry a high risk of restrictions

Cross-border e-commerce

Amazon · eBay · Shopee

12

Best avoided

Main issue: Proxy IP

Linked-account store closures are driven first by shared IPs, and only then by data center ranges

Email sending

SMTP · marketing email

0

Best avoided

Main issue: Abuse reports (abuseipdb)

Blocklists make or break deliverability, while sending from a data center IP is normal and is not penalised

Evidence

Why it got this score

  • −33

    Abuse reports (abuseipdb)

    Confidence 66%, 83 reports in the last 90 days

    What it means
    Someone reported this IP to an abuse database (AbuseIPDB), typically for SSH brute force, port scanning or comment spam. The reporter may have seen a program on this machine, or a previous tenant.
    Which uses care
    Cares most: Social sign-up, Email sending
    Why it is weighted this way
    Counted at half the database's confidence. Sign-up scenarios care most: IPs with bulk-registration or credential-stuffing history are their first priority to block.
    Can it be fixed
    Reports age out; with no new reports for 90 days the score drops. If your machine is the one scanning, check for implanted software first.
  • −30

    Proxy IP

    2 data sources flag it as a proxy exit, without identifying the type

    What it means
    A source marks this address as a proxy exit without saying whether it is a VPN, a datacenter proxy or something else.
    Which uses care
    Cares most: AI services, Social sign-up, Streaming / short video, Gaming platforms, Cross-border e-commerce
    Why it is weighted this way
    Two or more sources agree, so it counts in full, slightly lighter than a confirmed VPN because the type is unknown.
    Can it be fixed
    These labels are usually applied to whole ranges and are hard to clear by behaviour; moving to an unlabeled range is the practical fix.
  • −12

    Blocklist hit: s5h.net

    Listed by s5h.net

    What it means
    This IP is on a public blocklist. Most lists record addresses that sent spam or took part in scanning or attacks.
    Which uses care
    Cares most: Email sending; Barely looks at it: AI services, Social sign-up, Streaming / short video, Gaming platforms
    Why it is weighted this way
    A single aggregate list is moderate evidence, so about a dozen points; the email scenario more than doubles it because receiving servers query these lists directly.
    Can it be fixed
    Every list has a removal process, provided the cause is gone; some delist automatically after a quiet period.
  • −9

    Attack activity on record

    42 events recorded: Vulnerability Probing ×42

    What it means
    A commercial risk database recorded attacks from this IP: credential stuffing, bulk registration, comment spam and the like.
    Which uses care
    Cares most: Social sign-up, Email sending
    Why it is weighted this way
    Tiered by count rather than linear: 1 and 8 are about the same (someone used it), hundreds are a different story. The cap is kept low because the same record already feeds that vendor's overall score.
    Can it be fixed
    Same as abuse reports: stop the source and the record fades with time.
  • −5

    No rDNS record

    No PTR record; IPs allocated by established carriers usually have one

    What it means
    This IP has no reverse hostname (PTR record). Addresses allocated by established carriers usually have one.
    Which uses care
    Cares most: Email sending
    Why it is weighted this way
    A few points only: a missing PTR is a weak "unknown origin" signal, not a stain. Email cares more, since receiving servers check it.
    Can it be fixed
    Most hosts let you set a PTR in the control panel; set it to a sensible hostname.
  • +3

    No open ports

    Network scans have not observed any open service on this IP

    What it means
    Network scanners have not observed any open service on this IP.
    Which uses care
    Barely looks at it: AI services
    Why it is weighted this way
    A small bonus: a small attack surface means fewer chances of ending up in scanner and abuse databases. Not evidence of home broadband; a well-firewalled server looks the same.
    Can it be fixed
    An inherent attribute of the IP or its range; nothing a user can change short of a different IP.
  • +5

    Native IP

    Registered and used in the same country, allocated directly by a local carrier

    What it means
    Registered and used in the same country, allocated directly by a local carrier: a "native IP".
    Which uses care
    Cares most: Streaming / short video, Gaming platforms; Barely looks at it: Email sending
    Why it is weighted this way
    A bonus: region-based checks will not trip.
    Can it be fixed
    An inherent attribute of the IP or its range; nothing a user can change short of a different IP.
  • +6

    Spamhaus ZEN: residential range declaration

    PBL — range judged dynamic by Spamhaus

    What it means
    Spamhaus PBL declares this range as dynamic residential space that should not send mail directly. Not a stain: it is evidence of home broadband.
    Which uses care
    Cares most: Email sending; Barely looks at it: AI services, Social sign-up, Streaming / short video, Gaming platforms
    Why it is weighted this way
    Counted as a bonus because it indirectly confirms a real access network.
    Can it be fixed
    An inherent attribute of the IP or its range; nothing a user can change short of a different IP.
  • +8

    IP type: Residential

    Residential broadband is the IP type risk systems trust most

    What it means
    A residential, mobile, education or government network address: the kind of source risk systems trust most.
    Which uses care
    Cares most: AI services, Social sign-up, Gaming platforms, Cross-border e-commerce; Barely looks at it: Email sending
    Why it is weighted this way
    A bonus: the vast majority of real people come from these networks, so the default stance is to let them through.
    Can it be fixed
    An inherent attribute of the IP or its range; nothing a user can change short of a different IP.

Reputation

Blocklists and abuse history

Listed on 1 of 8 blocklists checked: s5h.net.

  • proxycheck.io 42 attack events recorded
  • abuseipdb abuse confidence 66%, 83 reports in 90 days

Limits

What an IP check cannot tell you

Each platform's internal risk labels
Platforms keep their own IP reputation data and ban records and do not publish them. No hit in public sources does not mean a platform has nothing on this IP.
Whether the IP is truly exclusive
Sharing is only the number of devices observed in the same subnet. It cannot show who else is using this exit right now, or what they are doing.
Which accounts this IP has been tied to
Account-to-IP links exist only inside each platform. Accounts previously banned on this IP are invisible to us.
Device, browser and behaviour
Risk systems look at IP + device fingerprint + behavioural rhythm together. A clean IP with an odd fingerprint or behaviour still gets blocked.
Whether the account profile matches the IP
When sign-up country, phone number, payment method, language or time zone disagree with the IP's location, platforms verify further. That is unrelated to IP purity.

Sources

Data sources and responses

  • rdap
    326ms
  • team-cymru
    78ms
  • ip-api.com
    136ms
  • proxycheck.io
    428ms
  • abuseipdb
    428ms
  • cloud-ranges
    5ms
  • tor-exits
    5ms
  • rdns
    1322ms
  • shodan-internetdb
    327ms
  • dnsbl
    392ms

Machine-readable versions of this report: JSON · plain text · 中文报告