IP purity report
103.114.202.39
82/ 100
Fair
confidence: high
Usable; platforms with strict risk controls may occasionally show a CAPTCHA.
Based on signals observed from public and partner data sources at 2026-09-20 13:04 UTC. This describes IP-level risk only; platforms' internal risk data is not visible to us.
- VPN exit
Profile
What this IP is
- Country / region
- Thailand · Nonthaburi · Pak Kret
- IP type
- Residential
- Native / broadcast
- Native IP
- Network
- AS9335 Readyidc Limited partnership
- Reverse DNS
- none
- Devices seen in subnet
- 4
Suitability
What it is good for
Each use case weighs the evidence differently; these are not one overall score.
AI services
ChatGPT · Claude · Gemini
Borderline
Main issue: Known VPN exit
Least tolerant of data center and proxy exits: more likely to get degraded service, verification prompts or account limits. Spam history does not matter here
Social sign-up
X · Discord · Telegram · Reddit
Good fit
Main issue: Known VPN exit
Sign-up is the strictest checkpoint: data center / proxy exits are more likely to be asked for phone verification or refused, and IPs with bulk-registration history are blocked far more often
Streaming / short video
TikTok · Netflix · YouTube
Good fit
Main issue: Known VPN exit
Native IP and low sharing matter most: a broadcast IP reads as a region mismatch, and shared exits get throttled
Gaming platforms
Steam · PSN · Epic · Nintendo
Good fit
Main issue: Known VPN exit
Region locks, regional pricing and gifting all follow the IP's location, so broadcast IPs tend to be treated as cross-region; data center exits carry a high risk of restrictions
Cross-border e-commerce
Amazon · eBay · Shopee
Good fit
Main issue: Known VPN exit
Linked-account store closures are driven first by shared IPs, and only then by data center ranges
Email sending
SMTP · marketing email
Good fit
Main issue: Known VPN exit
Blocklists make or break deliverability, while sending from a data center IP is normal and is not penalised
Evidence
Why it got this score
- −20
Known VPN exit
Only 1 data source flags it as a VPN; the evidence is limited, so it counts at half weight
- −10
1 open ports
Includes admin ports 22: clear evidence of a server rather than home broadband
- −5
No rDNS record
No PTR record; IPs allocated by established carriers usually have one
- +4
Very low observed sharing
Only 4 devices observed in the same subnet
- +5
Native IP
Registered and used in the same country, allocated directly by a local carrier
- +8
IP type: Residential
Residential broadband is the IP type risk systems trust most
Reputation
Blocklists and abuse history
Not listed on any of the 8 blocklists checked (Spamhaus ZEN, SpamCop, PSBL, blocklist.de, UCEPROTECT L1, s5h.net, DroneBL, SpamRats).
- abuseipdb abuse confidence 0%
Open ports observed: 22
Limits
What an IP check cannot tell you
- Each platform's internal risk labels
- Platforms keep their own IP reputation data and ban records and do not publish them. No hit in public sources does not mean a platform has nothing on this IP.
- Whether the IP is truly exclusive
- Sharing is only the number of devices observed in the same subnet. It cannot show who else is using this exit right now, or what they are doing.
- Which accounts this IP has been tied to
- Account-to-IP links exist only inside each platform. Accounts previously banned on this IP are invisible to us.
- Device, browser and behaviour
- Risk systems look at IP + device fingerprint + behavioural rhythm together. A clean IP with an odd fingerprint or behaviour still gets blocked.
- Whether the account profile matches the IP
- When sign-up country, phone number, payment method, language or time zone disagree with the IP's location, platforms verify further. That is unrelated to IP purity.
Sources
Data sources and responses
- rdap170ms
- team-cymru70ms
- ip-api.com93ms
- proxycheck.io129ms
- abuseipdb506ms
- cloud-ranges16ms
- tor-exits16ms
- rdns1207ms
- shodan-internetdb155ms
- dnsbl201ms
Machine-readable versions of this report: JSON · plain text · 中文报告